首页> 外文OA文献 >Factors driving public support for road congestion reduction\ud policies: Congestion charging, free public transport and more\ud roads in Stockholm, Helsinki and Lyon
【2h】

Factors driving public support for road congestion reduction\ud policies: Congestion charging, free public transport and more\ud roads in Stockholm, Helsinki and Lyon

机译:推动公众支持减少道路拥堵的因素\ ud 政策:拥堵收费,免费公共交通等 斯德哥尔摩,赫尔辛基和里昂的公路

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Based on an across-the-board survey conducted among residents of Stockholm, Helsinki and Lyon, we explore the opinions on three policy measures to combat road congestion: congestion charging, free public transport and building more roads. The support for the two latter policies is substantially higher than the support for congestion charging, which is only supported by a majority in Stockholm. Self-interest is important for the formation of the opinion to all three policies. However, fundamental values and general political views, indicated by four attitudinal factors, are even more important in forming opinions towards the three transport policies. Of all attitudinal factors, the one indicating environmental concern most influences the support for all policies. Equity concerns, however, increase the support for free public transport and opposition to taxation increases the support for building more roads.\ud\udOur results further suggest that the opinions towards free public transport and building more roads can be mapped along the left–right political axis, where Environment and Equity are to the left and Pricing and Taxation are to the right. However, the opinion towards congestion charging cuts right through the political spectrum. The impact of the fundamental values and self-interest variables are similar for Stockholm and Helsinki, indicating that even if experience increases the overall support for charging, it does not change the relative strength of different political arguments to any major extent.
机译:基于对斯德哥尔摩,赫尔辛基和里昂的居民进行的全面调查,我们针对打击道路拥堵的三项政策措施提出了意见:拥堵收费,免费公共交通和修建更多道路。后两项政策的支持远高于拥挤收费的支持,后者仅在斯德哥尔摩获得多数支持。为了形成这三个政策的意见,个人利益很重要。但是,由四个态度因素表示的基本价值观和一般政治观点在形成对三种运输政策的意见时更为重要。在所有态度因素中,表明环境问题的因素最会影响对所有政策的支持。然而,出于公平考虑,增加了对免费公共交通的支持,而对税收的反对则增加了对建设更多道路的支持。\ ud \ ud我们的结果进一步表明,关于自由公共交通和建设更多道路的意见可以沿左右方向绘制。政治轴,环境和公平在左边,定价和税收在右边。但是,对于拥堵收费的观点贯穿了整个政治领域。斯德哥尔摩和赫尔辛基的基本价值观和个人利益变量的影响相似,这表明即使经验增加了对指控的总体支持,也不会在很大程度上改变不同政治论点的相对强度。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号